Head-to-head for women
Eden vs Hers
Eden and Hers both offer GLP-1 telehealth to women, but they make different trade-offs on PCOS and hormonal suitability, clinical oversight, price and access. Here they are side-by-side on the Metabolic-Fit Score — our women's-health rubric.
Eden
Higher scoreRanked #2 for women · Grade A−
Metabolic-Fit / 100
Best for: Mothers who would rather pay a little more for visible clinical oversight and labs than chase the cheapest vial.
Visit EdenHers
Ranked #6 for women · Grade B
Metabolic-Fit / 100
Best for: Mothers who want a familiar, app-driven consumer brand with a smooth onboarding and an explicit women's identity.
Visit HersThe verdict for women
Eden edges out Hers on the Metabolic-Fit Score, 90 to 83 (A− vs B). Mothers who would rather pay a little more for visible clinical oversight and labs than chase the cheapest vial.
Hers is still a genuine option — one of the few mass-market brands built around a woman's front door — app-first, nationwide, and easy to start, though the hormonal depth behind the branding is thin. Weigh the six women's-health factors below against your own priorities.
Side-by-side on the six factors
Both providers scored on the same women's-health rubric — the higher side on each factor is marked. See the methodology.
Price, access & features
| Detail | Eden | Hers |
|---|---|---|
| Metabolic-Fit Score | 90/100 · A− | 83/100 · B |
| Overall rank | #2 | #6 |
| Semaglutide | $196/mo | $199/mo |
| Tirzepatide | $296/mo | Not disclosed |
| Coverage | All 50 states | All 50 states |
| Brand-name access | Compounded only | Compounded only |
| Oral / sublingual | Injection only | Yes |
Metabolic-Fit / 100
Eden
Ranked #2 · Grade A−
What we like
- Strong clinician involvement and transparent supply-chain disclosure
- Both molecules nationwide, with lab-aware onboarding
- High verification confidence — you get follow-up, not a one-and-done prescription
The caveats
- Priced above the cheapest compounded tiers
- Compounded only — no brand-name path
- PCOS and postpartum framing is general, not a specialty service
Metabolic-Fit / 100
Hers
Ranked #6 · Grade B
What we like
- Explicit women-focused positioning and strong brand trust
- Nationwide with a polished app and oral options
- Low-friction, mass-market onboarding
The caveats
- Tirzepatide pricing isn't consistently disclosed
- Limited hormonal or postpartum depth behind the marketing
- General weight program rather than a clinician-led metabolic service
Assume any provider we list may compensate us — we may earn a commission, at no cost to you. It never changes a Metabolic-Fit Score. Pricing, states and verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last review; the Metabolic-Fit Score is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.
More head-to-heads
Keep comparing Eden and Hers against other providers we review for women.
Or browse the full comparison hub.